Ozwald wrote:I was making a distinction between brett flavor & a classic brett characteristic. Of course you're not going to get a beer that tastes like 001 by pitching only a brett culture. But you won't necessarily get that classic Belgian Pale Ale flavor either. You could get something completely fantastic, but it could be many different flavors. There's more different strains of brett than sachro, just not readily available to brewers.
That classic brett characteristic is defined by certain phenols, which are only produced when the brett is under stress. It doesn't have to be a lot of stress & that stress could come from a number of different things besides the presence of another yeast or alcohol (although since the vials seem to be intended as a secondary pitch, as you pointed out, that's what ends up happening). It could be fermentation temp, pH, cell count or a number of other things.
You can brew some nice brett beers without stressing the yeast at all, which is why I pointed out that it depends on where you want the beer to end up, but if you're after a classic brett characteristic in a Belgian Pale, it's not the best way to go after it. There was a great guest on the Session not too long ago talking a little further about it. Yacobsen I think.

RLinNH wrote:Great thread!!! I have a Keg of Flanders Red that I just killed last night. I fermented it in primary with WLP001, then I added the Wyeast roselaire blend. I let it sit in the secondary for 2 1/2 years in my basement which goes anywhere from 65 degrees on up to 75. I realized my mistake about the roselaire only about a month ago as far as this blend being intended to do all the primary fermentation, but none the less, I feel that the beer turned out great.
RLinNH wrote:For my next Flanders red, I am going to go the WLP001 for primary again, but this time I want to add a White Labs Brett. Just don't know which one yet. Opppsie, sorry about the threadjack. This thread got me thinking about sours...![]()

Brandon wrote:RLinNH wrote:Great thread!!! I have a Keg of Flanders Red that I just killed last night. I fermented it in primary with WLP001, then I added the Wyeast roselaire blend. I let it sit in the secondary for 2 1/2 years in my basement which goes anywhere from 65 degrees on up to 75. I realized my mistake about the roselaire only about a month ago as far as this blend being intended to do all the primary fermentation, but none the less, I feel that the beer turned out great.
Why do think it was a mistake to do a clean fermentation then pitch the Roe? That process has made a lot of nice Flanders Reds. It's just a matter of at what gravity you pitch the Roe blend. Nothing wrong with what you did.RLinNH wrote:For my next Flanders red, I am going to go the WLP001 for primary again, but this time I want to add a White Labs Brett. Just don't know which one yet. Opppsie, sorry about the threadjack. This thread got me thinking about sours...![]()
You will never make a Flanders Red with that plan. It would probably make a nice clean Brett Red, but it will never be a Flanders Red unless you add bacteria (Lacto/Pedio). Brettanomyces is not a bacteria, its a yeast...Brett doesnt sour beer.
RLinNH wrote:Then educate me Brandon. I have been of the opinion that Roelaire blend was a Yeast that is supposed to be used singularily in a fermentation. I am guessing that I am wrong? What would you do for a fermentation for a Flanders Brown?


Users browsing this forum: No registered users