Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:26 pm
I have done 3 hopburst ales in the past 3 brew sessions.
The first was an IPA with 40 IBUs from only hops added with 25 minutes or less additions. My notes on it were that it was both VERY malty and VERY hoppy. It was really different, and I really enjoyed it. If I could change something about it, I'd like it better with maybe 10 IBUs coming from bittering hops added at 90 minutes or FWHs. It was overwhelmingly hoppy out of the secondary. And you could really taste the crystal hops from all the other hops for about 1 week after I carbed it. Then the crystal hops dissapeared completely out of the hops formula and it just tasted very pleasently hoppy/skunky at the same time. Here is the recipe for 13.3 gallons boiled down to 12 gallons:
8.5 lb 2 row
8.5 lb pilsner
4.5 lb victory
0.75 lb munich light
0.75 red wheat malt
0.65 oz horizon 11.6% 25 min
0.55 oz chinook 13.1 % 25 min
2 oz columbus 17% 17 min
0.75 oz amarillo 9.6% 10 min
1 oz crystal 3.1% 10 min
The second was an all wheat porter with late hops added the same way as above. I am not impressed with the hops/bitter balancing in this beer. The roastiness from the porter overwhelms any discernable hops character at all - My tastebuds say Hopburst doesn't mix well with Roastiness.
I am intrigued with hopburst ales. I haven't experimented enough with these but I hope what I have learned might help another. My question is when doing a hopburst ale, what kind of difference will using a bittering high alpha hop like Summit/Columbus/Horizon make vs a large amount of aroma/flavor hop such as Crystal/Cascade in an amount to achieve the same bitterness?
Note I am curious to try an ESB as a hopburst ale using the only "noble" high alpha hop that I know of being Horizon. Any thoughts on how that would turn out??