mmadia wrote:A counter flow chiller looks more appealing than an immersion, as the CFC is quicker and uses less water.
This is debatable. If you use a submersible pump, like for an aquarium, you can recirculate ice water from a bucket through an IC after the tap water drops the temp in the beginning. Also, if you don't use the Whirlpool-a-la-Jamil method you can still either stir the wort around with a sanitized spoon, OR just move the IC around a lot to get good heat exchange and faster cooling. ICs are also easier to clean, do not need to be sanitized since the boil will do that for you, leave a lot of trub, break and hops behind if you transfer carefully and cost less. Of course, if you're still sold on Counterflow, I'll sell you my Chillzilla for a good price!
mmadia wrote:i'm wondering if a stainless steel racking cane(which i already have)+high heat tubing+wort wizard would be better than drilling+weldless spigot+high heat tubing.
I had a Wort Wizard and I LOVED it. Then the aeration wand (part that fits into the carboy with a bunch of holes drilled into it) got caught on my shirts as I walked by and *SNAP*. At that moment I realized it was just another proprietary tool and I was dependent on a small company for replacements. Also, like I said above, a LOT of cold break material transfers into the carboy (formed in the CFC) even if you leave hot break and trub behind.
Not to say you need a spigot. I use mine for the whirlpool, but I still rack the chilled wort out of the top.
I'm sure others love their CFCs, but I have one sitting on a shelf now and I'm back to ICs for good, or maybe I'll try that no-chill method...
Just my $0.02
Rob