It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 7:29 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Meantime London Porter
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:35 am 
 Profile

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:06 am
Posts: 2
Just finished listening to the show and looking forward to trying this one. In the show the brewer mentioned this brew was around 35 IBU's but when I plug the hop additions (22g @75, 24g@10, and 24g@0) in Beersmith I get an IBU of 16.6 using Rager. What gives, were these supppose to be double the given amount?

Thanks,

LD


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Meantime London Porter
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:49 am 
 Profile

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 13
LiverDance wrote:
Just finished listening to the show and looking forward to trying this one. In the show the brewer mentioned this brew was around 35 IBU's but when I plug the hop additions (22g @75, 24g@10, and 24g@0) in Beersmith I get an IBU of 16.6 using Rager. What gives, were these supppose to be double the given amount?

Thanks,

LD


Doing the same batch size?
Same Alpha Acid on the hops?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Meantime London Porter
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:37 am 
 Profile

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:06 am
Posts: 2
Yes on both, 21.8 Litres and 4.7%AA. Unless they were shooting for a lower IBU??


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Meantime London Porter
PostPosted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:21 am 
 Profile

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 13
Ah hang on, I know whats happened.

The brewer from Meatime stated 35ibu's... problem is that it is a measured ibu value. That means they have a lab test the ibu's.
Homebrewers dont get that luxury usually, so we have to rely on basic estimation formulas like Rager, Tinseth etc and they often dont match the same numbers the lab produces. If you listen to the show again, Jamil later comes up with an ibu value that homebrewers can use to match the real thing. Jamil says 18 ibu (rager).

Hope that makes sense.

Cheers


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Meantime London Porter
PostPosted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:34 pm 
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:30 am
Posts: 295
Location: dallas
Pretty sure it's the utilization from late additions that don't get calculated as contributing as many bu's as they really do.

Does anyone know if the software programs assume that you go from boiling to chilled in a set amount of time?

_________________
"You may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas."


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Meantime London Porter
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:22 am 
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:31 am
Posts: 150
mookie1010 wrote:
Pretty sure it's the utilization from late additions that don't get calculated as contributing as many bu's as they really do.

Does anyone know if the software programs assume that you go from boiling to chilled in a set amount of time?



Great question! I'm looking for the answer, too. I wish the major brewing software packages would give you the ability to input the amount of time that it takes you to chill from boiling at flame out down to yeast pitching temps and have it adjust the IBUs taking that into account.



Adam


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2009 phpBB Group