Nalgene bottles

Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:29 pm

Jamilz talked about Nalgene bottles for yeast harvesting on the last show and mentioned http://www.cynmar.com but i cant find them on the site. :cry: does any one have a straight link?
thanks
jason
User avatar
JAWSFREE
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: charleston sc

Thu Dec 01, 2005 6:08 pm

"Make beer not war"

Currently fermenting: Firestone Walker Pale 31 clone
Conditioning: Nothing
On draught: Nothing

Watch episodes of BYOB TV: http://www.kofytv.com/byob-tv/archive/
User avatar
BeerPal
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 6:55 am
Location: Martinez, CA

Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:29 am

Be careful to get the polypropylene bottles (like mentioned on the show), as the polyethylene (ex. LDPE, HDPE) ones are not autoclavable.

Nalgene is more a brand name than a type of bottle. They make all kinds of plastic bottles, flasks, beakers, etc., namely made of polyethylene or polypropylene.


- joe
User avatar
trans
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:45 pm
Location: Valencia, PA

Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:23 pm

trans wrote:...not autoclavable.


Damn, I knew I forgot to buy something at the homebrew store!

Okay, who has an autoclave and thus why is it so important to buy an autoclavable bottle if no one does?
User avatar
Danno
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:12 pm
Location: West Linn, OR

Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:02 pm

Danno wrote:Okay, who has an autoclave and thus why is it so important to buy an autoclavable bottle if no one does?


Well, I'm sure hardly any homebrewers have a lab-grade autoclave lying around seeing as they are insanely expensive, but a lot of homebrewers do have pressure cookers. Essentially a pressure cooker acts as an autoclave, but isn't quite as sophisticated as the lab-grade ones.

Now, I was only pointing out to get the autoclavable kind because if JAWSFREE was planning on repitching by following Jamil's directions exactly, he would have to put the bottles in a pressure cooker and hit them with about 250 degrees. If one were to do this with something like an HDPE (high density polyethylene) bottle, it'd be right around its melting threshold of 260 degrees (if memory serves correctly). As such, the plastic would probably be all deformed and would be fairly weak.

The polypropylene bottle on the other hand can handle the 250 degrees and still keep its structural integrity intact.

If one was planning on sanitizing a bottle or hitting it with something like 212 degrees, then the HDPE bottle would work just fine. (To be honest, I don't even trust HDPE at 212 degrees due to the deformation to causes)., Just keep in mind that under both cases, you are only sanitizing, not sterilizing. But if you want to sterilize instead of sanitize, you have to have at least 250 degrees, because 212 actually only kills most, but not all of the bacteria present.

I hope this response made some sense, and maybe Jamil can chime in and give his input.
User avatar
trans
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:45 pm
Location: Valencia, PA

Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:21 pm

I don't think sterilization is critical here because the recovered yeast comes from equipment (buckets, carboys, etc) that was sanitized, not sterilized so there is already going to be some small level of contamination. My recommendation is to just sanitize the container. If Jamil is saying to autoclave or pressure cook it, I think that's overkill. Now, if this was a starter that was grown under sterile conditions, I'd be more inclined to continue with sterility wherever possible. Starting with 'sanitary' and then going 'sterile' isn't necessary IMHO.

Yes, I use a pressure cooker for wort starters but I have never sterilized the mason jars that I use to store yeast from a previous batch of beer.
User avatar
Danno
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:12 pm
Location: West Linn, OR

Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:45 pm

I disagree. Are you saying that there is already some contamination, so you might as well just add to it? :shock: :D

I think that every step of the way you do everything you can to minimize contamination. If you can have sterile items, that is what you should use.
I hope my post helped in some way. If not, please feel free to contact me.

Jamil Zainasheff
http://www.mrmalty.com

"The yeast is strong within you." K. Zainasheff
User avatar
jamilz
 
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:17 am
Location: Elk Grove, CA

Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:09 pm

i have heard hundreds and hundreds of times, I dont sterilize, i dontdo this, do that, bla bla bla, and they all say i have never had an infection, well every time ive tasted a brewers beer that say they dont have infections, actually do....the problem is they have become accustomed to it and cant taste it.

if you want to See how easy a yeast can go funky try this

take 2 agar plates, sterilise 1 and just add hot agar to the other, streak them and seal them air tight........see the funk grow.

The fact that you are taking yeast from a previously sterile environment means nothing, I dont know of any brewery that has any means of keeping a fermenter sterile, but at the stage of end of ferment its not so bad, but if you contine to put the yeast into a unsterile environment your asking for trouble
Thank God All Mighty For Titties and Beer
User avatar
Ozbrewer
 
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:28 am
Location: Warrington UK

Next

Return to Brewing Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

A BIT ABOUT US

The Brewing Network is a multimedia resource for brewers and beer lovers. Since 2005, we have been the leader in craft beer entertainment and information with live beer radio, podcasts, video, events and more.