Jimbob wrote:I agree that the pH should be a concern but there is no way to estimate you pH when calculating the water profile that you are building.
You can estimate how much the pH will be expected to shift relative to a DI water base malt mash, most such mashes come in at 5.7 - 5.75. The shift is 0.00168 pH per unit of RA expressed as ppm as CaCO3.
Jimbob wrote:RA is the prime indicator for what you want.
Not really. RA is a way of comparing water sources and giving rough indications of what you may need to do to them depending on the style of beer to be brewed. The Ca/PO4 reactions quantified, to some extent, by the RA can only take you so far. It is more likely that mash pH will be set by added acids either in the form of dark malts, acidulated malt or acid from a bottle.
Jimbob wrote: I feel pretty confident with what I've done so far, of course I could post some of my profiles and and be told that I am way off. However my I've been designing the RA of the water to meet the requirements of the beer style.
There is a rough correlation between the RA of the water used to brew a style and the style's depth of color (SRM or EBC) but styles do not have RA requirements. If someone tells you that you "need" an RA of 500 to brew a stout (and I've seen such things posted) ignore that person. In general you should design the water to have the general characteristics of the water of the region in which the style originated (e.g. Irish stout ~ hard, high carbonate RA 50 - 150; Boh. Pils ~ very soft; Helles ~ high carbonate hardness but otherwise low mineral content; Burton ales ~ lots of sulfate hardness...) and then do whatever you need to do to get the mash pH right doing it, where possible, the way the original brewers of the style did it (Irish Stout ~ roasted barley; Pils ~ sauermalz; Helles ~ decarbonation, sauermalz; Burton ales ~ do nothing). If you approach it this way you will get something that is highly authentic but not necessarily the "best" beer. You can use this "authentic" method as a way to get to a starting point for recipe development.
The proof of the pudding is in attaining a proper mash pH. If you have a meter, use it but be sure you know how (calibration), understand its quirks and so on. With decent meters avaialable now for $90 a pH meter should (IMO) be part of every serious all grain brewers kit. As experience is gained it should be possible to put the pH meter aside by which I mean that if you brew the same beer to the same recipe using the same water treatement 10 times in a row and get a proper mash pH 10 times in a row you shouldn't have to do a check on the 11th. OTOH the pH drop that comes in the first few hours of a healthy fermentation is always a comforting assurance that the fermentation is off to a good start.
Jimbob wrote:I also agree that all RO water is not the same. I have sent samples of the RO water that I purchase from a vendor in my area. So I know what that profile is.
Certainly the profile of the RO water used for synthesis has some effect on overall qualties of water built up from it but as RO units are effective in removing most of most ions (i.e. 90% or more) the actual ion content should not be that significant unless the water is really loaded before passing through the RO unit or you are designing soft waters (e.g. for a Boh. Pils or Helles). Most RO units sold have specs on how much of what they take out and you ought to be able to get a decent idea of what your RO output profile is by applying those numbers to the analysis of the input water.