Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:07 pm
Assuming that the problem is not failure to rinse soap off equipment it is the result of "saponification" (literally conversion to soap) of triacyl glycerols forming an organic salt with a metal ion. The basic reaction, for a single alcohol ester (mono acyl glycerol - I made that up) is CH3OCOR + NaOH ---> CH3OH + NaOCOR in which R represents a long acyl chain from the long chain fatty acid HOCOR. In this reaction methanol is produced along with the soap NaOCOR. In the reaction with triacyl gylcerols you have three of the CH3OCOR esters linked together, it takes three alkalai molecules and instead of the simple methanol molecule a glycerine, H(CHOH)3H, molecule is produced along with 3 of the resulting salt molecules (the soap). Saponification, clearly takes place most readily at high pH (OH ions are consumed) when a metal ion is present.
So for your beer to taste soapy you need:
1) Grease (the triacyl glycerol)
2) High pH
3) Metal ions.
WRT 1: All grains contain oil to a greater or lesser extent and there isn't much you can do about it except try to get it out of the beer to the extent you can do this. Next time you brew feel some of the teig that settles on top of the grain in the lauter tun and also the hot break material in the kettle. Both are greasy. So it should be obvious that you do not want this break material to enter the fermenter. Whirlpool, use a hop back or take whatever measures are necessary to prevent this stuff from getting into the beer. There is debate as to whether the same should be the case for cold break. Most agree that it leads to soapiness but if the hot break has been managed the level should be so slight as to hardly be noticeable and, some say, the lipids in the cold break relieve the yeast of the job of producing all the lipids they need de novo.
WRT 2: Beer pH is well below the best pH for saponification (you grandmother used strong lye solution to raise pH) but the need for hydroxyl ions suggests that prevention of saponification is yet another reason to want to keep mash and kettle pH respectably low. This is conjecture. I have never seen (or if I have, don't remember) any data on saponification vs. pH.
WRT 3: While I suppose you might advance an argument that brewing with soft water denies the saponification the cations it needs the fact that malt contains quite a lot of metal tends to weaken that argument to my way of thinking.
It's already been said that healthy yeast properly managed tends to prevent problems with fermentation in general but it is interesting to consider that notoxygenating might actually help in reducing saponification beacuse the yeast would, lacking oxygen, assimilate more lipid from the wort than if oxygen is present.
FWIW I have never experienced soapy flavors in any beer I've produced and I do mostly lagers all of which contain at least some Pilsner malt. So I don't think it's something you can ascribe to Pilsner malt. I don't do anything special to minimize saponification but I do strain wort out of the kettle through the hop bed (I always have at least some leaf in the kettle for this purpose) which settles out on a false bottom and I do pay attention to pH throughout the process. I do not separate cold trub.
[Edit: left out an oxygen atom]
Last edited by
ajdelange on Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.