tlael wrote:samsonave wrote:Bottled this brew this weekend and FG was 1.002. FYI...
1.082 all the way down to 1.002?
OK, NOW it sounds infected!
BN Army // 13th Mountain Division 

anday6 wrote:Maybe try calibrating your hydrometer? Even with an infection, 1.002 is pretty low.
BN Army // 13th Mountain Division 

Ozwald wrote:anday6 wrote:Maybe try calibrating your hydrometer? Even with an infection, 1.002 is pretty low.I hate it when I don't notice there's another page before I respond
Not only the hydrometer but the thermometer as well.
The wild yeast/bacteria do have the potential to eat every remaining bit of sugar left. Depending on what's in an infected sample, it can drop below 1.000. I'm not convinced that this particular circumstance is infected, but a quick taste with an educated palette will answer that very quickly.
BN Army // 13th Mountain Division 


spiderwrangler wrote:If the issue is not having yeast, your only option at this point is to add some. Unfortunately, this is time intensive and opens you up for possible contamination. Dosing with champagne yeast rehydrated in sterile water may do the trick.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users