Im sure all of you heard my comments but I felt a little held back, being new here and with an intention not to offend but to understand.
I will stick to the politician comment though.
As a brewer of ten years I have always tried to push the boudries but never have been egotistical enough to "not" relate my brew to others and embrace all the knowledge that came before us, that makes us the brewers we are.
What I saw can be related to a musician"which I am, so it make sense to me" try to be origional and cast off all styles which make ones skills what they are. We all want to be origional, and some of use feel offended in the comparing ourselves to others. Yet the simularities can not be denied, hence "J's" comments on what Mr Hunts brews tasted like.
It could be argued that the creation of the orgional styles that most of us replicate have to start somewhere. It is my opinion that its all been done, much like music. Whether this be commercially available or by the average schmoe. I hiss at Mr Hunts replacment of style for name because the average consumer knows nothing of brewing guidlines, which all should know are nothing more than boudries to judge. I would have felt much better with an approach admiting style, but omiting boundries. Which in essence is what Mr Hunt was doing. Much like a politician he danced around this and left most of us with a sour taste. All I saw was a selling angle, a commercial, a hook, which was further enforced by his lack of care, and that his beer include a plane ticket. I relate to this man for my ego stretches far beyond my physical and creative means. Never do I deny influence and make what is creative into a maketing statement. He said he pays his bills with this endevor, but its my experience that most brewrys of his size start for the love and not for the glory. Im not trying to deny this man a buck(being small business myself, 500k this year) but honesty is what it is. I make solid surface countertops I was thinking of calling them polymer based gravity controlers.
Heath