Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:46 pm
I just watched the movie via Netflix and I agree with everyone's impressions.
I liked some of the movie, but I think the director missed the real story and then caught it just in pieces. She wanted to tell a story about the little guys against the big guys, but missed the best story.
The best story, is that this is a battle in which people passionate about brewing and bringing craft back into a product that had long since become a marketing vehicle. She caught some of this but the inclusion of Rhonda and really herself in the movie lead it down another less coherent and compelling path. Was that Edison beer even good? No one talked about it.
Perhaps the guy who leads Stone is an asshole, often the people who push the envelope are, but showing that would have made the story much more compelling, more complex, and less of a simple tale of good small and bad big.
Along those lines, I also thought it was a bit too Michael Moore in the editing and the bad guy / good guy / black and white approach. Could the lite beer drinkers not tell the difference between the brands or did she just show us the people who missed? Is the poor guy at AB that much of a clone or did she just pick the worst edits? Is it really just AB's fault that people want lite beer or did we just demand a very light beer as a strong preference and AB just moved to the next place they could differentiate their product from all the other very lite beers - marketing.
But, I still liked it.... it caught elements of a transition happening between mass marketed products and craft products and people choosing quality oven quantity in their lives. Or in my case, both.
but it could have been a lot more.
BB Brew Ranger, BN Army, New England Squadron