straining wort?

Thu May 04, 2006 8:31 pm

I was listening to the archive from this Sunday and the discussion about transferring from kettle to fermenter.

I'm doing extract, partial boils and I was told to pour the chilled wort through a strainer and into the fermenter. Are these other ways better? What are the advantages/disadvantages to straining vs. whirlpooling and racking.

Thanks for your help.

Andy
User avatar
hejl
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 8:24 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Fri May 05, 2006 4:12 am

With straining your still getting a lot (probably most) of your break material into the fermenter. All you are really getting in the strainer is the hops. By whirl pooling you leave almost all of the break in the kettle. The whirlpool will settle all particulate matter into the middle of the kettle then you can either rack or open you valve on the side of the kettle.

The downside to whirl pooling and racking, in your situation, is that you are getting some aeration by pouring it through the strainer. This is a good thing as long as the wort has been cooled already.

Travis
_________________
A very silly place... http://yarnzombie.net/Travis/

Without question, the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer. Oh, I grant you that the wheel was also a fine invention, but the wheel does not go nearly as well with pizza.
-Dave Barry
User avatar
Lufah
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: Mt. Vernon, OH

Fri May 05, 2006 4:25 am

Ok this is a bit off topic.... nice hat lufah:)

Back to the subject at hand. I used to use a strainer in my funnel that was a fine mesh screen. It was a pain in the ass it would clog with hop material all the time and would cause it to take forwaever for me to poor the wort into the fermenter. I soon just started dumping everything in and using a secondary a week or two later. Sine you are doing extract brew you may have less hotbreak material since the extract should already have it removed.
User avatar
BrotherhoodBrew
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:24 pm
Location: Carrollton, TX

Fri May 05, 2006 4:54 am

The way I deal with the hops blocking the funnel is to set a large strainer in the funnel and then have the little screen as well. I couldn't find a picture of me actually doing it that way, but take a look at this and think of putting a larger strainer in the top of the funnel.

Image

Travis
A very silly place... http://yarnzombie.net/Travis/

Without question, the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer. Oh, I grant you that the wheel was also a fine invention, but the wheel does not go nearly as well with pizza.
-Dave Barry
User avatar
Lufah
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: Mt. Vernon, OH

Fri May 05, 2006 8:16 am

I have noticed that the hop crud tends to clog up the filter if it's just the tiny screen in the funnel and the bigger strainer over top was much better to do this.

I didn't realize about the break not getting out with the filter. I guess that since I'm doing extract I'm not getting as much of this, so I don't notice it as much. Someday I need to sit in with an AG brewer and see the difference.

It may also come down to how much you worry about all of this. I had a brown ale yesterday that I made and it was unbelievably clear, that was taking no particular care.

Also, Travis - love the Jayne hat. The episode where Jayne was the hero of the people may have been the funniest episode of Firefly.
User avatar
hejl
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 8:24 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Return to Extract & Partial Mash Brewing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

A BIT ABOUT US

The Brewing Network is a multimedia resource for brewers and beer lovers. Since 2005, we have been the leader in craft beer entertainment and information with live beer radio, podcasts, video, events and more.