Danno wrote:...
I'll also take issue with batch sparging being more efficient than fly sparging...
I won't argue with you there. A well-designed fly system will almost certainly have a greater potential for efficiency than a batch system. I was recommending that insco32 try a couple batch sparges to see if his low efficiency was caused by the mash (pH, crush, or schedule) or if it was caused by the sparge (tun geometry, manifold, or speed of runoff). A batch sparge takes the sparge out of consideration, so to speak. If batch efficiency goes up compared to fly, it means the mash is pretty good and you should take a look at your MLT design and fly sparge procedures. If the batch efficiency stays low, but relatively the same as the fly, take a look at mash parameters.
I was just recommending a batch trial as a diagnostic technique, not that he switch. I'd probably switch to fly sparging myself except that I'd need another pump. Like you, I don't really save any time.