Does anyone know of a microbrewery using a home brewer-style recirculation mash?
Does anyone know a reason that micros might not want to use a constant recirculation mash?
Recirculation mashing just seems like such a great way to ensure even temperatures in a simple English-style mashtun to me; it even seems simpler than installing and dealing with a mash mixer and with an added heat exchanger you could even perform step mashing using an existing simple and cheap mashtun. It also seems like the constant recirculation would save time as you'd get conversion faster AND you wouldn't need to do the vorlauf step at the end of mashing before starting sparging.
As the sparge is the most time consuming part of a commercial brewday and a lauter tun has the best width to height ratio for lautering/sparging I also see a possible opportunity for a micro to use a lauter tun vessel as an MLT; typically the downside from a mashing perspective of mashing in a lautertun is the large surface area means that you'll lose heat quickly but if you're recirculating the mash through a heat exchanger similar to the home brew HERMS systems you can maintain your temps through the mash, again clarify without a separate vorlauf step (as the whole mash is "vorlaufed"), and then you would get a faster runoff and lauter than using a typical micro mashtun where you have a 1:1 or even 1:2 width to height vs. the ideal 2:1 for lautering.
I've had this stuff in my head and I have to get it out; it's hard to find good brewery engineering materials all the brewery consultants just seem to keep it all in their heads...
Adam



