Yeast Attenuation question

Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:16 pm

I just racked my brown ale to secondary and it has gone from a 1.050 to a 1.010 in 8 days in the primary.

I am a bit disapointed as the flavor of the sample was a little dry and not sweet enough for a brown. I guess my yeast overattenuated but not sure why. I used english ale yeast.

I used a batch sparge at 150-153f rest and mashout at 165ish. I'm guessing my rest temp was too low and did not pull out enough non-ferementing sugars. Am I right??
kagey
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:56 pm

Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:39 pm

it could be a combination of a lot of things, mash temp, rement temp grain bill



can you post your recipe? including the yeast strain
Thank God All Mighty For Titties and Beer
User avatar
Ozbrewer
 
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:28 am
Location: Warrington UK

Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:35 am

Batch Sparge in Ice Cube cooler.

4.5 Pale 2 row us
4.5 pale 2 row UK
.5 brown malt
.5 british crystal
.1 black
.1 chocolate

1oz fuggles 60 min
1oz fuggles 30 min

British Yeast - Wyeast 1098

Forgot to smack the pack and pitched straight into fermentor (no proofing). No fermentation for 36 hours so added 1 packet of Nottingham dry yeast, fermentation started in about 6-8 hours.
kagey
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:56 pm

Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:01 am

You are almost certainly getting the results of the Nottingham rather than the 1098. Nottingham tends to finish notoriously dry and far more clean than the pleasant British fruitiness you were likely expecting from the 1098.
bubrewer
 

Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:06 pm

I agree with bub. It's the Nottingham. While we're at it, I think the recipe could use another half pound of crystal, too.
Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors -- and miss.
--Robert A. Heinlein: The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
Brewing Water Page - Enter and view water data.
User avatar
George
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:52 pm

Thanks guys. Sounds logical. Good thing is that my sample didn't taste bad so at least I've got some beer to drink. . .

Next time I am going to do a yeast starter to make sure I get enough yeast to start fermentation earlier.

Also I am still figuring out my system efficeincy so looks like I may need to use a bit more malt to start with and mash at a bit higher temps if I want to get sweeter malt flavor. Part of the problem is that I'm having trouble hitting initial temps and maintaining them in my MTL.
kagey
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:56 pm

Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:31 pm

It's a common misconception that mashing higher makes beer sweeter or maltier. It does not. Mashing higher produces more dextrins which raise FG and body, but dextrins aren't sweet. The way to make sweeter beer is to get carmelized sugars that yeast can't metabolize. That means using crystal malts (which are pre-caramelized) or boiling longer. Basically, the grainbill determines sweetness. And to a smaller extent the attenuation of the yeast.
Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors -- and miss.
--Robert A. Heinlein: The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
Brewing Water Page - Enter and view water data.
User avatar
George
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Return to All Grain Brewing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

A BIT ABOUT US

The Brewing Network is a multimedia resource for brewers and beer lovers. Since 2005, we have been the leader in craft beer entertainment and information with live beer radio, podcasts, video, events and more.