Cliff wrote:bobbytuck wrote:bobbytuck wrote:JAnd when I say thin, I mean thin -- as in it took my 65 minutes to fill a 6 gallon better bottle. (And I probably only got about 4 gallons due to the loss from the hops).
BUT~!!! Watching his video I was struck by a couple thoughts:
1.) Gravity may be the ideal way to run it because the flow is gentle and won't slam the hops against the top of the container
2.) If you are using a pump try using a throttling valve on the pump's output side before the flow gets to the hop rocket to see if a gentler flow lets the hops inside tumble around more easily instead of plugging it up. I suspect that with a reasonable hop load and a pump you may actually be forcing the hops to get all jammed up under the forced flow of the pump.
Yep -- I think that's it. Tasty suggested this earlier, too.
I'm brewing this weekend, and I'm going to throttle back the pump and see what happens. I'm not sure gravity would work in my case because my BK is only a foot or so above the hoprocket on the ground (using a TopTier, and I don't really like feel like messing with the tiers now.) In the Spring, I may go from three tiers to two -- and move my BK so that it's at the same level as my MLT (about three to four feet off the ground.)
I may brew a second batch whirlpool-only and see if I can taste a difference. I've made satisfyingly hopped-up beers with late additions and whirlpooling, so I suspect my desire for the HopRocket was more to try something new than actually make a drastic shift in the taste of the beer. (Although if it does that -- that's great.)
My four batches I've made with the HR are still fermenting in my basement. I gotta admit -- they taste pretty damn good (a couple of IPAs, a brown ale, and Denny's Rye IPA). I'll probably bottle at least one and maybe two over the upcoming turkey day.