Decoction mash paradox ?

Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:32 am

I was listening to a Brew Strong episode the other night, and the guys were talking about decoction mashing.
I was under the impression that the decoction method used the liquid, but they were saying you boil the grain pulled from the mash.
Another impression I was under, was that we lauter to separate the mash from the grain to boil.
So if you're going to pull grain to boil a number of times for up to an hour or more each time, how is that different than leaving the spent grain in the boil kettle?

I'm not interested in doing decoctions, it's just something that occurred to me.
Tags and taxes on 3 vehicles = brewing withdrawals
User avatar
KYT
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:59 am
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Decoction mash paradox ?

Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:54 pm

When you pull the thick part of the mash (the grain part) and boil it you are leaving most of the liquid behind, so generally the pH won't go up (even though the temp does) and the lack of water won't leach tannins into the wort, so the action is more like "cooking" the grist than "boiling" it. In a sense, the tannins kind of stay put, because there is no place for them to really go (think of particle equalization/dispersion across a membrane).

Leaving the spent grains in the boil allows a large volume of water to contact the husk at all times. This coupled with the long heat causes the tannins to come out causing astringency.
High pH also causes the same effect.

HTH-
-B'Dawg
BJCP GM3 Judge & Mead
"Lunch Meat. It's an acquired taste....." -- Mylo
User avatar
BDawg
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: North Bend, WA

Re: Decoction mash paradox ?

Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:01 pm

Conical Fermenter - Amber Lager
Keg#1 Dunkel
Keg#2 Helles
Keg#3 Flanders Red
Keg#4 Star San
Keg#5 Star San
Keg#6 Star San
User avatar
Kbar
 
Posts: 984
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Decoction mash paradox ?

Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:47 am

I really hate decoction mashes. SGTSatan loves them, and when I brew with him, he does triple decocotion brews just to piss me off! :x
"Mash, I made you my bitch!" -Tasty
User avatar
Dirk McLargeHuge
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 5702
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:43 pm
Location: Fredericksburg, Texas

Re: Decoction mash paradox ?

Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:48 am

BDawg wrote:When you pull the thick part of the mash (the grain part) and boil it you are leaving most of the liquid behind, so generally the pH won't go up (even though the temp does) and the lack of water won't leach tannins into the wort, so the action is more like "cooking" the grist than "boiling" it. In a sense, the tannins kind of stay put, because there is no place for them to really go (think of particle equalization/dispersion across a membrane).

Leaving the spent grains in the boil allows a large volume of water to contact the husk at all times. This coupled with the long heat causes the tannins to come out causing astringency.
High pH also causes the same effect.

HTH-


Ah ok that makes sense.
Tags and taxes on 3 vehicles = brewing withdrawals
User avatar
KYT
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:59 am
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Decoction mash paradox ?

Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:51 pm

Dirk McLargeHuge wrote:I really hate decoction mashes. SGTSatan loves them, and when I brew with him, he does triple decocotion brews just to piss me off! :x

i did a triple decoction doppelbock a few years back, the beer turned out GREAT but i don't know if i want to go through that again.
my name is Richard Edward, just call me Dick Ed.
speed
 
Posts: 879
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 12:05 pm
Location: nebraska

Return to All Grain Brewing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

A BIT ABOUT US

The Brewing Network is a multimedia resource for brewers and beer lovers. Since 2005, we have been the leader in craft beer entertainment and information with live beer radio, podcasts, video, events and more.